Page style:

A Blue Perspective: When your server explodes

When your server explodes
21 January 2004

Overnight on my web host's server the "Harddisc crashed. It has been replaced and data is being restored with latest available backups." Of course, this means I've lost over a week's worth of data. Of course, this means I'm changing web hosts.

Therefore, I'd like to quickly get people's suggestions as to their favourite web host so I can move to sunnier surrounds as quickly as possible. Has to be Linux, fairly cheap (say US$0 - 10 per month) and reliable.

I know that a quite a few of the design sites host with Media Temple, and having a look at their site they seem pretty good, so they're in the lead at the moment. All help is appreciated.


1/28. 21 January 2004 @ 12:23, Erik Sagen wrote:

I use So far, so good.

2/28. 21 January 2004 @ 12:58, Beau wrote:

I use and am thinking of using is pretty good, but I have had times when they have been offline for a few hours (not very often tho).

I'm told dreamhost are good and they look pretty impressive.

3/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:11, Justin French wrote:

HDD failure is a fct of life on any host... Even if they've got a RAID system, nothing is a certaintly.

Finding a host that does nightly back-ups of pages AND databases would be your safest bet, but I'm tipping there aren't many who offer that.

I don't think changing hosts will help you at all here -- it'll possible even INCREASE the risk, because at least with the current host, you know the HDD is brand new today :)

I'm sorry for your loss of data, but why didn't you make your own back-ups :)

A weeks worth of lost data isn't too bad -- it could have been a LOT worse.

4/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:19, Ray wrote:

I've been hosting one of my domains on my own linux box...fortunately my ISP allows "reasonable use" of bandwidth, so I'm definitely not getting thousands of page veiws/day, but it does give my the luxury of a server configuration that suits my needs exactly. Depending upon traffic and your ISP, this might be a viable option

I do have a couple others that are hosted by a freind that has a dedicated 10Mbit conn, however, this is on a windows server.

5/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:22, Simon Jessey wrote:

I am happy with my webhost,, but I might also suggest that you ask Matthew Mullenweg ( ) if he can help you out. He does it for selected friends and colleagues (like Dave Shea's Mezzoblue, for example).

6/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:50, Paul wrote:

I use
They are not cheap but I have had another site of mine on them for over 1 year and have not suffered any noticable downtime for more than 2 min on 1 instance.

7/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:56, The Man in Blue wrote:

It's not a world ending loss, but it's not just today's loss of data, it's a general speed/reliability thing. Today was just the catalyst for getting me into action.

8/28. 21 January 2004 @ 17:25, Matt Burris wrote:

If you hurry, you can take advantage of the 3 years free professional hosting over at -- I've been using them for over 5 months now and they've been solid as a rock, never gone down so far. There's no catch to the promotion.

9/28. 21 January 2004 @ 18:18, Erik Sagen wrote:

Wow. Thanks for the heads up Matt.

Per your suggestion I signed up for an account.

So, we'll see how this goes. 3 free years is nothing to complain about and from the looks of their site and their service it all seems really polished.

10/28. 21 January 2004 @ 18:38, Mike wrote:

I've been using Xrach Hosting for a while, excellent service and they bend over backwards to keep me happy.

About 10$/month if you pay a year in advance. Unix based.

11/28. 21 January 2004 @ 13:56, The Man in Blue wrote:

Well, 12 hours of calming thoughts and financial exigencies have lead me to believe that finishing out my contract with my current web host (4 months) is the best course of action. However, I'll definitely be looking to move on after that, so thanks for the information posted above, it'll really help me.

After re-constructing my latest posts and restoring script files I'd changed, in the end the only thing I've lost is comments; they're highly valuable for their ideas and thoughts, but I'll survive. Incidentally, quite a few web hosts offer daily backup.

(You got me all excited about 1on1 hosting Matt, only to have my hopes dashed by the requirement of a US/Canadian residency. Their setup does look good though.)

12/28. 22 January 2004 @ 02:14, Erik Sagen wrote:

Yeah. You know, to tell you the truth.. I never really think of things like that. Living in the US all my life I suppose I've become quite accustomed or even spoiled at several of the services that are limited to US and Canadian residents only.

Although, I'm sure it works the same way for the Aussies. You have services limited to Australia only, I'm sure.

13/28. 22 January 2004 @ 03:09, The Man in Blue wrote:

Yeah, we have our special KangarooNet that you guys can't access.

14/28. 22 January 2004 @ 06:58, Matt Burris wrote:

Sorry about that, I didn't realize you were in another country. It does suck that you have to be in the U.S. and Canada. I know a lot of British friends who were disappointed that they couldn't take advantage of the deal.

15/28. 22 January 2004 @ 07:31, Ben Vaughan wrote:

I'm using these guys:'re incredibly inexpensive and have been nothing but helpful. Support is timely and performance pleasing. :)

16/28. 22 January 2004 @ 07:59, Erik wrote:

Yeah, we have BushNET. ;)

17/28. 22 January 2004 @ 09:14, Shawn Kelley wrote:

When you do decide to switch, I highly recommend Dreamhost. I've been with them for over three years now and have signed up more than a dozen others who love them as well. They've got great service, fantastic deals and they're always increasing what you get for your money, all while guaranteeing that you'll never have to pay more. There are a number of others in the "design world" who use them as well, including Todd Dominey who has highly recommended them in the past.

18/28. 23 January 2004 @ 12:35, Justin WS wrote:

I don't wish to sound unsympathetic as I too have had a similar experience of being wiped out by a hosting failure. The one thing that this experience did teach me is that it doesn't matter who you host with - BACK UP!
Ultimately you are responsible for your own data and can easily prevent loss from hardware failure yourself. While most hosting companies do their best to protect you from these losses, they usually provide the means for you to do perform your own back ups and will stress that you should do so.

19/28. 24 January 2004 @ 00:37, j.bon wrote:

I m on,their prices are good and supports are excellent :)

20/28. 27 January 2004 @ 12:30, joshie surber wrote:

http://www.eryxma.comcheap and reliable. keep me happy.

21/28. 30 January 2004 @ 07:03, Me wrote:


22/28. 30 January 2004 @ 07:40, James Craig wrote: server packages with root access on debian... best deal around.

23/28. 30 January 2004 @ 09:40, Roger wrote:

I 've used Hurricane Electric ( for a couple of years and have found them to be reliable and helpful.

24/28. 31 January 2004 @ 13:21, Sverrir Gunnlaugsson wrote:

I recommend Dreamhost.
Fantastic company with good user support.

25/28. 1 February 2004 @ 09:22, Aaron wrote:

I've used Pair hosting for 5 years and dozens of domains - also my old employer hosts quite a few sites on them from a recommendation from me...

26/28. 10 February 2004 @ 02:58, Richard Rutter wrote:

A little late coming to this conversation, but I'd happily recommend (
For $3 a month you get Apache, PHP, MySQL, Python, unlimited POPs, your own cgi-bin, daily backups (files and db) and a fair bit more besides. More money gets you more disk space and more bandwidth if required.

They also give excellent service to support requests and queries. I use them for and bunch of other domains as well.

27/28. 25 February 2004 @ 09:41, no1son wrote:

<a href="DNS""">JaguarPC</a>">">JaguarPC</a>is 10$/month with great features. They bought out <a href="DNS""">Aletia,">">Aletia,my former host. Aletia still does great <a href="DNS""">DNS</a>">">DNS</a>for very little money too. I just switched over from

28/28. 25 February 2004 @ 09:42, no1son wrote:

sorry about that, didn't read. :P

Post your own comments

Fields marked with an asterisk* are mandatory. All HTML tags will be escaped. http:// strings in comments will be auto-linked.

DNS"" />


  • DNS"">SSCrabble 27 January 2004
  • DNS"">When the war is over 24 January 2004
  • DNS"">When your server explodes 21 January 2004
  • DNS"">Information, 75% OFF! 19 January 2004
  • DNS"">[R]ather [S]wanky [S]ourcecode 16 January 2004
  • DNS"">Drowning in voices 13 January 2004
  • DNS"">Typing one handed 9 January 2004
  • DNS"">... just like spiced ham! 7 January 2004